Peptide Intelligence — Research AI
Honest enough to tell you the evidence is weak
Peptide Intelligence reads the published literature on peptide compounds and combinations, grades the evidence A–E, and screens every analysis for safety concerns. Every decision routes back to your healthcare provider.
Sources: PubMed · ClinicalTrials.gov · openFDA
What it does
Verify
Citations you can verify
Every citation is checked server-side against the actually-retrieved record from PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and openFDA. If a source can't be verified, it's stripped — you never see it.
Grade
Evidence graded, not hyped
Every compound gets an A–E evidence grade with the criteria shown. Combinations are analyzed as combinations — the interaction question the forums never answer.
Screen
Screened before anything else
A GREEN/YELLOW/RED gate reviews every analysis for safety concerns, including regulatory and WADA status. A RED result sets the optimization content aside and points you to care.
The scale
Every claim lands somewhere on A–E
| Grade | Label | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence grade A. | Strong clinical evidence | Strong clinical evidence. Multiple high-quality human RCTs, robust meta-analysis, established therapeutic use supported by high-quality evidence. |
| Evidence grade B. | Moderate human evidence | Moderate human evidence. Several human studies, reasonably consistent outcomes, limitations remain. |
| Evidence grade C. | Preliminary human evidence | Preliminary human evidence. Small trials, pilot studies, uncontrolled studies, limited human datasets. |
| Evidence grade D. | Preclinical evidence Human efficacy is not established. | Preclinical evidence. Primarily animal studies, cell studies, mechanistic evidence. Human efficacy is not established. |
| Evidence grade E. | Anecdotal / speculative Human efficacy is not established. | Anecdotal / speculative. Testimonials, forums, social media, practitioner anecdotes, theoretical mechanisms. |
The same public scale for every compound, criteria shown. Grades D and E stay visibly unresolved — the design refuses to dress them up.
How it works
Describe your situation or name the compounds
Paste the stack someone handed you, name the single compound you have only ever heard mentioned, or describe a condition or goal with no compound in mind at all. Context you choose to share — like sport testing or an upcoming appointment — sharpens the research questions.
It retrieves and grades the published evidence
Live retrieval from PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and openFDA, with every citation verified against the retrieved record and every finding graded A–E. Where no study exists, it says "Not established" — never fills the gap.
You leave with provider questions, not a protocol
Every personalized analysis ends in specific questions to bring to a real healthcare provider — so the decision you make is an informed one, made with a clinician.
The refusals
What it will never do
- 01I will never tell you what to take, how much, or how often.
- 02I will never show you a citation I couldn't verify against the actual record.
- 03I will never write you a protocol — not even if you ask nicely.
- 04I will never pretend to know. When no study exists, the answer is "unknown," and I'll say so.
- 05I will never sell you peptides. No ads, no vendor affiliations, no commissions.